Iran P5+1 deal, is a “Historic deal” or “Historic Mistake” and for whom?

The conclusion of the agreement had generated buzz words such as a “Historic Agreement” by the West, meaning the P3 (US, UK and France) . A” Historic Mistake” by Israel and a “great achievement” by IRAN. On the other hand, China and Russia being on the side lines, watcher and irrelevant. By the way ,China & Russia show up to these meeting to get a free meal, with no impact or input or the outcome. Israel calls it a “Historic Mistake” for the West (part of P5) to agree and to sign on. So what is the truth here? The fact is, and I am here to argue that this agreement is a Historic Mistake for Iran to sign on and agree to it. They are the fools for accepting it and will come back to bite them in later on. Let us examine some of provision of this agreement”: Iran would undertake the following voluntary measures: 1.Daily IAEA inspector access when inspectors are not present for the purpose of Design Information Verification, Interim Inventory Verification, Physical Inventory Verification, and unannounced inspections, for the purpose of access to offline surveillance records, at Fordow and Natanz. o IAEA inspector managed access to centrifuge assembly workshops4; centrifuge rotor production workshops and storage facilities; and, uranium mines and mills 2.Provision of specified information to the IAEA, including information on Iran’s plans for nuclear facilities, a description of each building on each nuclear site, a description of the scale of operations for each location engaged in specified nuclear activities, information on uranium mines and mills, and information on source material. This information would be provided within three months of the adoption of these measures. Under these provisions, Iran lost its sovereignty. It must open their facility to daily inspection by anyone that IAEA chooses to send, or any location or at any time. It could be 2 am , if they want to. Israel on the other hand is working hard to undermine the agreement by all means possible. They will push the IAEA inspectors, through their surrogates, to demand inspections to places they have not agreed on. Trying to Box Iran. And if Iran refuses, then they are going to blame them for cheating, non compliance etc through their control of their media outlets. We have seen this game played in Iraq during the UN IAEA inspection regime. The IAEA inspectors demanded to inspect Saddam’s palaces. When he initially refused, the western media jumped on his case, screaming: what was he hiding? They even demanded to inspect his “Bed Rooms”. Now, the same game will be played here again, that is why Iran will be played, and in the same way they played Iraq. Iran lost its Sovereignty, that is why, at the end of the day, Iran is going to find out it is historic mistake to sign on. Time will prove it. Guaranteed

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Letter to The Arab News media and editors

Browning of America

can the Financial system be saved from the melt down